Peter Torebko vs David Rice Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L W W L L
Form
L W L W W L L L L LHead-To-Head: Torebko 1 - 0 Rice
They have played 1 sets in total, with Torebko winning 1 and Rice winning 0. The last match between Torebko and Rice was at the Germany F16, 27-09-2010, First, Carpet with Peter Torebko getting the victory 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Peter Torebko | 1 |
| David Rice | 0 |
Germany F16(27-09-2010)
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Uchijima VS Montgomery PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Hijikata VS Harris PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
21 Apr 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-0 ret. | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 3 | Games Won | 0 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Peter Torebko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Andrea Picchione
Player
Peter Torebko
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Peter Torebko
92%
(
35 of
38)
1st Serve %
43%
(
25 of
58)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
8
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(1) 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
view more
David Rice Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
David Rice
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lloyd Glasspool
Player
David Rice
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
David Rice
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kirill Dmitriev
Player
David Rice
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
7
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
14
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clay Thompson
Player
David Rice
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
104)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Rice
Player
Farris Fathi Gosea
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Rice
Player
Alexander A. Jesse
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sekou Bangoura
Player
David Rice
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Rice
Player
Maxime Tchoutakian
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
David Rice
48%
(
37 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (497/346) | Win/Loss | 55% (290/239) |
| 56% (1117/863) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (651/565) |
| 53% (9872/8838) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5714/5512) |
| 47% (18/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (140/90) |
| 62% (367/229) | Clay Win/Loss | 29% (14/35) |
| 54% (110/92) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (98/79) |
| 29% (2/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (38/35) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 2123 | Aces Total | 312 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 2076 | Total Double Faults | 345 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 597.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 559.05 |
| 56% (17852/31664) | 1st Serve % | 65% (4021/6208) |
| 69% (12349/17852) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2723/4021) |
| 48% (6651/13822) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1009/2187) |
| 44% (1568/3603) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (267/629) |
| 42% (13703/32418) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2518/6417) |
| 38% (3/5) | Slam W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 34% (11/21) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (121/110) | Challenger W/L | 52% (57/53) |
| 63% (362/209) | Futures W/L | 57% (232/177) |
| 59% (490/832) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (287/521) |
| 50% (3/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (131/247) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (65/132) |
| 58% (168/292) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (92/166) |
| 86% (462/396) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (281/234) |
| 14% (462/66) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (281/46) |
| 27% (381/101) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (248/56) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
